Mural Policy in next stage of hearings
In an isolated part of the Arts District, a grafitti style mural was created in time
for the opening of "Bicycle Junkies" last month. It was recently painted over by the owner to
comply with a mandate that the mural was unsuitable for the community.
At first an objection of one phrase, claimed by LAPD to be the subject of a complaint, was painted over by the artist with the word “Censored."
That same community was not included in any planning stages for the piece, Yet, there may be more concern by that same community, who have an appreciation of street art, that they were not included in the recent decision to paint over the same mural.
Meanwhile, in a busier part of the Arts District, a mural with the image of a Mona Lisa was painted by an artist for a commercial shoot and only needed permission by the
building owner. It has been allowed to stay despite a graffiti style
signature.
Is the difference between the two street style murals one phrase? Or is a icon of art, well crafted even if cliché, considered safe and suitable by LAPD?






Recent Comments